On or about September 2, 2025 a Deputy with the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office, Courts Division took a report of a an adult male sending inappropriate emails to multiple Hennepin County Judges. The deputy reviewed several emails sent by Roughani, Sina, [DOB REDACTED], Defendant herein to at least two identified Hennepin County Judges. Defendant sent emails from 6/16/24 to 4/23/25 and made comments such as, "Judge [1] is refusing his evidence and that is an abuse of his discretion." And if, "they will hold Judge [1]’s court accountable or will he do that himself by ordering me to appear and enter evidence." Defendant also stated, "stop abusing your discretion with inaction and his discretion is outright and demonstrably hostile and egregious." In one email Defendant stated, that he has called out magistrates and Judges in the past for their "unclean hands" and violating the 14th amendment and reporting them for hate crimes and witness tampering.
On August 27th, 2025 Defendant sent an email to Judge 2 along with 18 other parties and CC'ed 12 parties and made a reference to a NY times article where a US Attorney was unable to secure an indictment against an assault over a Subway sandwich. Defendant’s domestic assault case involves a sandwich and he ends the email with, "F*** all of you and die, I am ending you all permanently." The Deputy reviewed another email that was sent on 8/28/2025 at 2:05 AM, addressed to Judge 1’s staff email and two other email addresses.
In the email the Defendant writes more about the ham sandwich phrase and his human rights being violated. On that same day, Judge 1 responded to the email stating that it was unsolicited and the inappropriate venue for his grievances. The Judge asked not to be contacted further. On the next day at 1:48 AM, the Defendant responded to Judge 1’s email, now CC’ing Judge 2 and about 40 other email addresses including government officials and news outlets. In this email the Defendant calls the judge a crook, threatens to bring legal action against the judge, compares the Judge to Nazis, and calls the Judge a serial abuser and crook whose pathetic life is useless as something tax dollars are not worth wasting on ending with “You can leave now.” Specifically the Defendant stated that the Judge was committing antisemitic abuse of process “political abuse of psychology that you allowed done by those same Nazis like the German Bosch foundation that sponsored you.
Nuremberg trials will be held for you and your life will be subject to what you deserve.” Judge 1 spoke with a Deputy about the emails stating that one of the cases referenced in the emails involves allegations that the Defendant assaulted his sister over a sandwich. Judge 1 had previously denied several motions from the Defendant in that case on 12/23/2024. Judge 1 expressed concern over the mention of the Bosch Foundation, as he had received a scholarship from that foundation in 2003. Judge 1 was concerned by how closely the Defendant was looking at his history.
