Complaint Narrative Locked
The full probable cause statement — who was involved, what happened, and why prosecutors filed charges — is a DocDash feature. Enter your email to get a free preview of this case.
Get this case by email
We’ll send you the case details. No card required.
Create a free account to unlock this feature.
Finally, the employee from T-Mobile told Victim there was an outstanding balance on the iPhone. Victim discontinued the iPhone’s service with T-Mobile but still needed to pay off the remaining balance. The phone was valued at $1200.00. Officers communicated with Defendant via email. In the email correspondence, Defendant told officers: (1) that Victim agreed to pay off the phone; (2) that she tried to get the iPhone transferred to AT&T from T- Mobile; and (3) that AT&T would not transfer the iPhone without the necessary codes.
Defendant then told 3 27-CR-26-9446 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 4/14/2026 officers that AT&T took the phone in on a trade. On March 18, 2025, officers received an email from Victim. Victim [NAME REDACTED] was a fraudulent charge on one of the Business’s credit cards. The transaction was made in Defendant’s name on February 20, 2025, to Enterprise Rent-A-Car in the amount of $1699.08. Victim [NAME REDACTED] had been in an accident and had a rental car for several weeks. Victim [NAME REDACTED] had the rental car when she was terminated on February 10, 2025. Victim believed that Defendant’s insurance company had paid for the rental car.
On May 20, 2025, officers learned more information from Victim. Officers learned that Defendant had accepted cash from a client. Defendant kept the cash and marked the client’s account as paid. Officers learned that during the time the client was paying in cash, there were no deposits made to the Business. Further, Defendant and the Business had not discussed the cash payments. Between July 31, 2023, and December 13, 2024, a total of $3537.80 in cash was received from the client and not deposited into the Business’s account.
Victim learned of this when the client stopped by the Business to make a cash payment. The client told Victim that he often stopped by the Business to make cash payments. However, Victim was not aware of this until he met with the client on this occasion.