Brayden Jacob Glass

On February 22, 2026, law enforcement was dispatched to a residence located in Oakdale, Washington County, Minnesota, after receiving a theft complaint. J. E. G. Told dispatch that while she and her husband, K. C. S., were out of town, someone had stolen several of K. C. S.'s watches. Upon arrival, J. E. G. Stated that she and K. C. S. Were out of town between February 15 and February 21, 2026. J. E. G. Believed that her son, BRAYDEN JACOB GLASS, [DOB REDACTED], "the defendant" herein, may have been at the residence with her permission while they were gone.

J. E. G. Explained that the defendant had been kicked out of the residence in September 2025. J. E. G. Believed he had been at the residence because there were pizza boxes left in his room and a stick to keep a sliding glass door secure had been removed. When J. E. G. And K. C. S. Returned, they noticed that four of K. C. S.'s watches were missing. The total value of the watches taken were in excess of $1,000. J. E. G. Received a text from an unknown number that states, "Ya'll aren't getting those watches back.

I hope you guys know that. Fuck ya'll. You are a bitch and your mom to hoe." Neither K. C. S. Nor J. E. G. Gave anyone permission to take the watches. Law enforcement learned that the defendant had pawned two watches at Twin City Pawn in Oakdale, Washington County, Minnesota, on February 19, 2026. He had also pawned two additional watches at a Pawn America on February 21, 2026. Each pawn shop provided documentation of the transactions. The watches pawned were the watches taken from K. C. S. The identification used to complete the transaction at Twin Cities Pawn belonged to the defendant.

Law enforcement contacted the defendant via phone. He admitted to taking K. C. S.'s watches and pawning them. He claimed to only have taken two of the four watches. He claimed that K. C. S. Had given him the other two watches previously. The defendant does not have a permanent residence and reported to be living in his truck. His only reported address is the victims' address. There exists a substantial likelihood that he will fail to respond to a summons. A warrant complaint is requested.