1. Your complainant is employed by the Coon Rapids Police Department. In that capacity, complainant has reviewed official police reports and has learned substantially the following: On November 11, 2025, at approximately 6:51 P.M., Officer Ali was on patrol in the area of Highway 610 near East River Road, Coon Rapids, Anoka County, Minnesota, where the officer observed a motor vehicle cross over the white shoulder lane on the right side of the roadway with the entire passenger side tire. The driver then corrected the vehicle and began driving on top of the white lane marker.
The officer stopped the subject vehicle and spoke with the driver, who was later identified as Jesse Travis White, [DOB REDACTED], the defendant herein. In speaking with defendant, the officer observed the Defendant's eyes were glossy. He also detected an odor of marijuana coming from defendant. Defendant admitted to smoking his marijuana approximately four to five hours prior to driving. Defendant told the officer he had a severe concussion, fracture and broken bone on his face and could not perform the walk and turn test or the lack of convergence test due to his injuries.
Defendant did perform the Modified Romberg Test where he displayed visible eyelid tremors, his body was swaying back and forth and he estimated a time of 20 seconds instead of 30 seconds. Defendant subsequently blew a 0.00 reading on a PBT tester box at the scene. During a routine inventory of the vehicle, the officer located a small amount of marijuana which weighed 0.5 grams. The marijuana was not in a dispensary container. Based on the officer's training, experience, and contact with defendant, the officer was of the opinion that defendant was under the influence of a controlled substance, and the officer placed defendant under arrest for that offense. 2. The officer applied for and received a signed search warrant from the Honorable Judge Davis for a sample of defendant's blood or urine.
Defendant was informed refusal was a crime and informed of the existence of a search warrant. Defendant was asked to provide a blood sample. Defendant replied "no." Defendant was then asked to provide a urine sample. Defendant replied, "no." No sample was obtained from the Defendant. 3. Complainant has reviewed documents pertaining to defendant's Minnesota driving record which reveal that defendant's Minnesota driving privilege was revoked for alcohol‐related incident(s), and/or defendant was convicted of impaired driving offense(s) from incident dates as noted in the following table.
Incident Date Revocation Date Conviction Date 02/26/2023 05/15/2023 Pending ••-CR-••-•••• Defendant also has a conviction for driving while impaired from February 28, 2014.
