That your complainant is a peace officer employed by the Rochester Police Department who was advised of the following by a law enforcement officer with that agency, known to your complainant to be truthful and reliable and who is hereinafter referred to as officer: That on November 1, 2025, at approximately 2:50 A.M. Officer Kusick observed a 2015 Volkswagen Touareg bearing Minnesota registration of GFJ861, hereinafter referred to as the “vehicle,” being driven in the area of Elton Hills Dr. NW and Broadway Ave.
N in the City of Rochester, County of Olmsted. Officer Kusick saw the vehicle driving the wrong way in the lane of travel. Shortly thereafter, Officer Kusick initiated a traffic stop on the vehicle and identified the driver as Amer Mayom Mabor, [DOB REDACTED], hereinafter referred to as “Defendant.” Officer Kusick and Officer Ulrich observed that (1) Defendant had a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage; (2) Defendant’s eyes were watery, glossy and glazed over eyes; (3) Defendant’s speech was slurred; and (4) Defendant’s body movements were slow and delayed.
The officer observed an open container in the vehicle, which the defendant admitted was alcohol. Officer Ulrich administered standardized field sobriety tests and observed clues suggesting intoxication. Officer Ulrich administered a preliminary breath test to Defendant, which measured Defendant’s alcohol concentration at 0.219 BAC. Based on Defendant’s driving, performance during field sobriety testing, speech, balance, and appearance, Officer Ulrich believed Defendant to be under the influence of an alcoholic beverage.
Once at the Olmsted County Adult Detention Center, Officer Ulrich read Defendant the Breath Test Advisory. Defendant was given attorney time prior to making the decision whether to provide a chemical test. Defendant agreed to provide a breath sample for alcohol concentration testing. Defendant submitted to a breath test using the DMT instrument, which measured Defendant’s alcohol concentration at 0.17 on November 1, 2025, at 4:43 A.M. Defendant’s criminal history shows that within the ten years preceding this incident, Defendant has one conviction for DWI, entered on April 5, 2022 (55‐CR‐21‐1590). PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: YOU MUST APPEAR FOR EVERY COURT HEARING REGARDING THIS CASE. FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR COURT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE AND MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL CHARGES BEING IMPOSED AND PUNISHED AS PROVIDED IN MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 609.49.
