Complaint Narrative Locked
The full probable cause statement — who was involved, what happened, and why prosecutors filed charges — is a DocDash feature. Enter your email to get a free preview of this case.
Get this case by email
We’ll send you the case details. No card required.
Create a free account to unlock this feature.
Hinz stated that, in addition to Minnesota, the business had also been doing work in Florida. Hinz stated that he would fly between Florida and Minnesota as part of his efforts to get more construction jobs for Chando Construction. 3 62-CR-26-2521 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 4/14/2026 Hinz eventually became more concerned about the business’s financial situation. Hinz said that Chando Construction closed its Minnesota business and moved out of its office space. Hinz described the business as continuing to operate in some capacity in Florida into early 2023. Hinz stated that, at one point, Chando Construction had arranged for him to stay in expensive Airbnb accommodations in Florida, but he was kicked out because Chandonnet had failed to make payment.
During the interview, Hinz also told law enforcement that he had a list of people and businesses who had paid money to Chando Construction for work that had not been performed. Hinz said that many of these jobs involved repairs for storm damage, and he believed those projects largely involved insurance claims. Hinz said that he would gather the contact information he had for the impacted customers and provide it to law enforcement. The interview of Hinz occurred in May 2023. Hinz did subsequently provide law enforcement with contact information and other details for customers who had paid Chando Construction for construction projects that were never done.
Customers Victimized by Chandonnet Law enforcement began contacting former customers after receiving the information from Hinz. Hinz provided information for approximately 25 customers who were victims of not having construction jobs completed.