Complaint Narrative Locked
The full probable cause statement — who was involved, what happened, and why prosecutors filed charges — is a DocDash feature. Enter your email to get a free preview of this case.
Get this case by email
We’ll send you the case details. No card required.
Create a free account to unlock this feature.
The fire area was located separate from the electrical receptacles, and there were no remnants of cigarettes or other smoking material located in the area. There were also no smoke panels that indicated that the fire started from the HVAC system. Based on his observations, Investigator Edwards ruled out electrical overheating, improper disposal of combustible materials, and failure of the gas furnace as causes of the fire. However, Investigator Edwards determined that the fire was likely caused by ignition of readily combustible material in the basement, specifically the charcoal and Everclear.
Investigator Edwards classified the fire as incendiary. Following Investigator Edwards’ inspection, law enforcement conducted a search of the building pursuant to a search warrant. Officers took possession of evidence relevant to the fire and photographed the building. During the search, officers discovered that the wires to the security system had been cut, and the device storage surveillance footage was missing. CB reported that the system was functional and intact when she closed the store. The next day, Lieutenant Personius requested video footage from nearby 2 10-CR-26-301 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 4/9/2026 buildings.
Detective Robinson reviewed the footage and observed a grey vehicle pulling up to the front of the business at 1:42 AM on June 30 and a passenger exited the back of the vehicle. At 2:56 AM, a white vehicle arrived at the business, and a person entered the rear of the vehicle. Based on his observations, Detective Robinson believed the individual used a rideshare service to travel to and from the business.