This case involves sensitive sexual violence allegations.
Complaint Narrative Locked
The full probable cause statement — who was involved, what happened, and why prosecutors filed charges — is a DocDash feature. Enter your email to get a free preview of this case.
Get this case by email
We’ll send you the case details. No card required.
On November 30, 2023, DEFENDANT agreed to speak with law enforcement. There, DEFENDANT denied knowing any of the three women involved. However, DEFENDANT then stated that he was actually "friends with benefits" with M. G. DEFENDANT denied having sexual intercourse with J. S., A. B. Or M. G. That night. 2 09-CR-26-113 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 1/20/2026 DEFENDANT eventually stated that he did pick up three women on May 1, 2023 in Duluth and bring them to his residence in Cloquet. DEFENDANT said that he only spent "a couple of hours" with the women and then dropped them off at their respective homes.
He stated that when the women first arrived at his home, they were drinking "a lot" of straight alcohol and that they were getting "blackout drunk." DEFENDANT later described the women as "too f****** drunk to comprehend words." He stated that he did not consume any alcohol that evening and that he just wanted to play video games. Despite his prior statement, DEFENDANT said that he and M. G. Had sexual intercourse in his bathroom, but when asked about sexual intercourse with J. S. Or A. B., DEFENDANT stated, "not that I can recall." DEFENDANT said that because the women were so "blackout drunk," he decided to take them home at one point.
When asked for a sample of his DNA, DEFENDANT stated, "nope, I'm out." After refusing to provide a DNA sample, DEFENDANT continued to speak with law enforcement about the May 1 incident where he maintained that he did not engage in sexual conduct. Following the refusal and denial DEFENDANT promptly terminated the interview, and walked out of the interview room.